Conversation
a77013c to
ea71df4
Compare
dfb13d0 to
bee0dfe
Compare
|
Please, review the docstrings and typing. Also, the following comments I wrote before the last changes: It might be a good idea to split the generic files that include async and sync classes into async_xxx.py and sync_xxx.py class. |
fea6232 to
3d9b549
Compare
80ddf07 to
23c8fab
Compare
mpt_api_client/mpt_client.py
Outdated
| api_key: str | None = None, | ||
| http_client: HTTPClient | None = None, | ||
| ): | ||
| self.http_client = http_client or HTTPClient(base_url=base_url, api_token=api_key) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What do you think about splitting the constructor into two parts:
- straight forward the only one
def __init__(
self,
base_url: str,
api_key: str,
):
self.http_client = HTTPClient(base_url=base_url, api_token=api_key)
@classmethod
def from_http_client(cls, http_client):
return cls(http_client.base_url, http_client.api_token)
or vice-versa, don't know what is better
There was a problem hiding this comment.
depends on what is more used way to do it :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like the idea, but this breaks dependency injection.
What about:
def init(http_client):
def.http_client = http_client
def from_credentials(api_token, base_url=PROD_ENDPOINT):
return cls(HTTPClient(base_url, api_token)
c5bc557 to
5b20623
Compare
5b20623 to
1333fc6
Compare
- Unified ResourceClient and CollectionClient in Service - Renamed Resource Client to Service - Renamed Collection Client to Service - Renamed Resource to Model - Unified naming by adding Async as prefix to all Async implementation - Removed required custom collections in Services (CollectionClient) - Removed Resource Registry - Added Async Orders - Added Async MPT
1333fc6 to
c747af9
Compare
|



No description provided.